Lohan v. E-Trade
Actress Lindsay Lohan alleges a TV ad featuring a "milkaholic" baby named Lindsay used her name and personality for advertising purposes without her consent.
Irvin v. Mustafa
NFL Hall of Famer Michael Irvin files a countersuit against a woman who accused him of rape, alleging she is a "morally-bankrupt individual" who is trying to ruin his career.
Robbins v. Lower Merion SD
High-school student accuses a school
district of spying on him and other students
by remotely activating webcams contained in school-supplied laptops.
Peterson v. Grisham
10th Circuit finds John Grisham did not defame three Oklahoma law enforcement officials in a book about the wrongful convictions of two men for a rape-murder.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Feb   March 10   Apr

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4  5  6
  7  8  910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Owners of Who Dat?, Inc. sue the NFL and the New Orleans Saints for trademark infringement, seeking to protect the mark that "has become one of the most recognizable in all of America and quickly became well-known around the world."
Who Dat?, Inc. v. NFL Properties

• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations."
Sarver v. The Hurt Locker

• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others."
Evans v. University of Cincinnati

• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods."
St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix

• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'"
Kleinman v. City of San Marcos

• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods."
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'"
Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios

• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey."
Weisberg v. Chicago Steel




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


Crack-Dealing Suit Against Mistress Goes up in Smoke Print

The ex-lover of a Northern California man did not injure his wife by providing him with crack cocaine during their two-year affair, a jury has ruled in a case of sex, drugs and a law that makes drug dealers liable for the injuries they cause.

The defense verdict means the wife of Marc Siciliano, 53, of San Rafael will not recover any damages under California's Drug Dealer Liability Act (DDLA). Cynthia Siciliano, 46, alleged Jodie Graham-Potts, 49, of Petaluma was liable for the “willful, reckless, or negligent actions” of her husband related to his cocaine use.

Cynthia Siciliano's attorney asked the jury to award her at least $100,000 in economic and emotional distress damages. “What happened in this marriage is more than just an affair,” Robert Diskint of San Rafael argued. “It is a husband being destroyed by crack cocaine, provided to him by Ms. Graham-Potts.”

Marc Siciliano, a former minor league baseball catcher, has reunited with his wife and testified against Graham-Potts, saying she introduced him to crack and “cooked” it for him because he didn't know how. He described smoking crack as a “full-body orgasm” that caused him to mistreat his wife and nine-year-old daughter.

The plaintiffs' evidence included a homemade sex-and-drugs videotape in which Graham-Potts lights a drug pipe and offers it to Marc Siciliano. “Let's get this party started,” she says.

But during a 10-day trial in Sonoma County Superior Court, Graham-Potts said Marc Siciliano was already using drugs when she met him in 2003 and would show up for their trysts with a briefcase containing drugs. Her attorney argued she was not responsible for any suffering resulting from their shared drug use.

“The Drug Dealer Liability Act was never meant for this sort of action,” Lisa L. Gygax of Forestville tells On Point. “It was clearly a revenge situation wherein the wife and her lawyer father sought to punish her husband and the defendant, who was waiting for the husband to divorce his wife and marry her.”

Graham-Potts says the trial was a "humiliating experience" and she is hoping Cynthia Siciliano does not appeal. "Let the healing begin for all involved," she urged.

California passed the DDLA in 1997 after a lobbying campaign by the late actor Carroll O'Connor, who had blamed a drug dealer for his son's death. “A person who sold, administered, or furnished an illegal controlled substance” to a drug user, the law states, is liable for “injury resulting from” the use of the drug.

At least 13 states now have such laws but they have rarely been used, in part because plaintiffs or their relatives have to admit to using drugs. In 2007, the South Dakota Supreme Court found a pharmacy was not liable under that state's law for the death of a man who overdosed on prescription morphine he had picked up for a disabled friend. Schafer v. Shopko Stores, 741 N.W.2d 758.

A similar lawsuit against a pharmacy -- Whittemore v. Owens Healthcare-Retail Pharmacy –- is pending before a California appeals court.

Graham-Potts and Marc Siciliano began their affair after he hired her as a driver for his limousine service. They broke up after he was arrested for possession of drug paraphernalia and, during a fight, threw a water bottle at her, breaking her nose.

A few months later, Cynthia Siciliano's nephew discovered the videotape in the couple's pool house and she confronted her husband, who admitted the affair. She filed her lawsuit in 2008 after consulting with her father, attorney Lee E. Shroyer of Mill Valley, also naming her daughter as a plaintiff.

While her husband was using drugs supplied by Graham-Potts, she alleged in the complaint, he abandoned her “for days at a time,” had “violent fits of anger,” was unavailable for medical emergencies and caused her to develop stress-related shingles and insomnia. “He became a monster,” she testified.

But under cross-examination, Marc Siciliano described the hedonistic lifestyle he led before meeting Graham-Potts, including using drugs with others at his home while his wife was at work. When Cynthia found stray bags of methamphetamine in the house, he told her they belonged to a friend.

“My client is not proud of what happened,” Gygax said in her opening statement. “But this public flogging ... it's just revenge.” After the verdict was announced, a juror told The Press Democrat of Santa Rosa there wasn't clear evidence that Graham-Potts provided drugs to Marc Siciliano.

In passing the DDLA, California lawmakers cited the need to compensate “those who have suffered harm as a result of the marketing and distribution of illegal controlled substances.” But the Siciliano case shows the danger that the law will be misused as a “heart balm” by the scorned spouses of drug users.

Like most states, California does not allow “heart balm” or alienation of affections actions.

This story linked by:


By Matthew Heller
2/5/10


 
rc_insidestories
  • "Upskirting" Victim Loses Privacy Suit Against Store

    A customer at a T.J. Maxx store in upstate New York has lost her lawsuit against the retailer for allowing a man to take photos up her skirt by using her as “human bait” in a sting operation.
    Read more...
  • Perfume Allergy Case Settles for $100,000

    A Detroit city planner with an allergy to perfume is savoring the sweet smell of legal success after the city agreed to pay her $100,000 and be more sensitive to the chemically sensitive.
    Read more...
  • Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall

    A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
    Read more...
  • BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit

    Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
    Read more...
  • Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas

    What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
    Read more...
  • Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong
    Baby to Nurse


    Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
    Read more...
  • Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech

    Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
    Read more...
RC_OnFile

Newdow v. Rio Lindo Union Sch. Dist.
Subject: Pledge of allegiance
Document: Opinion

Vance v. Rumsfeld
Subject: Detainee abuse
Document: Opinion

Stern v. Sony Corp.
Subject: Disabled gamers
Document: Opinion

Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado
Subject: Academic freedom
Document: ACLU amicus brief

KBR/Halliburton v. Jones
Subject: Sexual assault
Document: Petition for review

more

RC_OnTrial

Spears v. Allergan, Inc.
Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior
Subject: Botox death
Verdict: Defense

Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools
Court: USDC, E. Mich.
Subject: Student harassment

more


RC_OnTheDocket

McClain v. Pfizer, Inc.
Date: 3/2/10
Court: USDC, Conn.
Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.

Sherman v. McDonald's Corp.
Date: 3/23/10
Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit
Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.

more